States, freebies and the costs of fiscal profligacy
- Need for instituting more effective checks that can make wayward States fall in line is compelling.
Growing freebie culture
- Political parties are outdoing each other in promising free electricity and water supply, laptops, cycles, electronic appliances, etc.
- These are called ‘freebies’ and are characterized as fiscally imprudent.
- Governments should use borrowed money to invest in physical and social infrastructure.
- It will generate higher growth, and thereby higher revenues in the future so that the debt pays for itself.
- If governments spend loan money on populist giveaways, the growing debt burden will eventually increase.
Misleading picture
- Analysis of State Budgets by RBI or any think tank,shows that State finances are in good health, and conforming to FRBM.
- It is misleading.
- Borrowing that funds freebies happens off budget, beyond FRBM tracking.
- Burden of debt is on State exchequer, although concealed.
- CAG: if extra-budgetary borrowings are taken into account, liabilities of government are way above what is acknowledged in the official books’.
Analysing the problem
- Motivation for States in expanding freebies is to build vote banks.
- Problem arises when transfer payments become discretionary expenditure, spending is financed by debt, and debt is concealed to circumvent FRBM targets.
Institutional checks, balances
- All of them have become ineffective.
- Opposition: whose responsibility it is to keep the Government in line.
- But they don’t speak for vote banks that are at end of these freebies.
- CAG audit : which should enforce transparency and accountability.
- Lost its teeth since audit reports necessarily come with a lag.
- Market is another potential check.
- It can signal health of State finances by pricing loans floated by different State governments differently, reflecting their debt sustainability.
- But market perceives all State borrowing as implicitly guaranteed by Centre.
Way ahead
- FRBM Act: Acts of Centre as well as States need to be amended.
- Aim: to enforce more complete disclosure of liabilities on their exchequers.
- Permission denied: Under the Constitution, States require Centre’s permission when they borrow.
- Centre should not hesitate to impose conditionalities.
- Financial emergency: President can declare financial emergency in any State if s/he is satisfied that financial stability is threatened.
- It has never been invoked as this will turn into a political weapon of mass destruction.
- Punishment: Root cause of fiscal irresponsibility is the lure of electoral success.
- It will stop only if political leadership fears punishment.
Prelims take away
- FRBM Act
- GST Council
- GST Compensation cess