Banner
Workflow

The ‘India pole’ in international politics

The ‘India pole’ in international politics
Contact Counsellor

The ‘India pole’ in international politics

  • The question that India is on which side of the ongoing Ukraine- Russia war has intensified.
  • The problem with the question is that the parties (Here US and Russia) habitually assume that there are just a few select sides in world politics.

India as a ‘Pole’

  • Indian policymakers think of themselves as a pole in the international system.
  • Origin of this thought:
  • country’s long struggle for independence.
  • Pre and post-Independence articulations of leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru, Gandhiji, etc on international politics;
  • Primacy India inherited as the legatee state of the British empire in South Asia
  • India’s large civilisational sense of self
  • Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) experiment

What it entails

  • Classical view of polarity
  • Domination of the international system by the great powers
  • Balances of power by them
  • Alliance-building based on ideology
  • Distribution of power for the purposes of such balancing.
  • Indian view
  • Not actively sought to dominate the South Asian regional subsystem
  • Has a balancing behavior (for instance, the 1971 India-Soviet Treaty during the Bangladesh war) on emergencies.

Elements of India’s idea of being a pole

  • Believes it has a strategic periphery in South Asia
  • Discourages interference by other powers in that space
  • Tends to speak for ‘underprivileged collectives’, physical (South Asia) or otherwise (NAM, developing nations, global south, etc.)
  • Welcomes the rule of law and regional order
  • Provider of common goods than as a rule setter or/of demander of allegiance.

What should be done

  • India is a pivotal power in the Indo-Pacific and beyond
  • Can to help tackle security, climate & other challenges of global consequence.
  • Western powers must, therefore, treat India as a partner rather than as a cheerleader.
  • Should mainstream India into global institutions such as the UNSC
  • Should consult India rather than dictate to India which side to take.

Conclusion

  • As India becomes the chair of the G20 and the SCO in 2022, it will further seek to assert itself as a major pole in the international system, and dissuade demands to follow one camp or another.
  • Therefore, those wishing to work with India on the global stage must learn to deal with the ‘India pole’.

Prelims Takeaway

  • G20
  • SCO
  • G7
  • UNSC

Categories